North Wiltshire Conservatives - Return to main page
Home | News | Blog | Events | About Us | People | Links | Contact Us |

In this section
- Section Home


Archive
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006

RSS Feed Blog RSS feed


Search this siteSearch this site



Join our mailing listJoin our mailing list




RSS FeedsRSS Feeds

- News RSS
- Blog RSS
- Gallery RSS



Monday, 26 February, 2007
James Gray: Local and National

Constituency work and Parliamentary work sometimes seem a mile apart; sometimes they overlap. Recent shenanigans over the on/off/on/off closure of the six leisure centres, for example, are entirely local matters, in the hands of the incompetent District Council. But they are a matter of such huge concern to so many constituents that I feel no embarrassment at having taken a full and active part in the campaign to keep them open. It is quite possible – as I did – to make use of Parliamentary resources as part of that campaign. An adjournment debate in Westminster Hall, for example, is often a good way of highlighting what would otherwise be an entirely local issue.

 

Other times, matters of overwhelming importance in Parliament can somehow seem to have terribly little resonance or importance locally. Very few of the debates and votes in Parliament last week were topics of hot discussion at the highly enjoyable Malmesbury Mayoral ball which I attended on Friday night, nor in my surgery in Wootton Bassett on Saturday. Last Tuesday’s Planning Gain Supplement - Remaining Stages, for example, commanded few front page headlines. Yet of such stuff is the Parliamentary day consumed.

 

But just sometimes there is a neat overlap between the two. We remain of course overwhelmingly concerned about Iraq and Afghanistan; about the legality of the war in the first place, and about how to extract ourselves now from the mess in which Mr Blair looks likely to leave us. I rather welcomed the Government’s announcement that we were progressively to withdraw from Iraq now, and their brave attempt to map out some kind of route to do so. And I was by no means opposed to the announcement that we would simultaneously build up our forces in Afghanistan, where, if we do not defeat the Taliban, the security of the world will be endangered for generations to come. These are maters of key local as well as national interest. I enjoyed breakfast on Tuesday with the new Head of Strike Command, who filled me in on some of the details surrounding the destruction of the grounded Hercules from RAF Lyneham in Helmand Province a couple of weeks back. I remain very concerned about the safety and security of the Hercules crews who carry out such essential work in all of our theatres of war, as well as about the other military personnel from the area – from Hullavington, Colerne and Corsham, for example.

 

Then on Friday I attended a most interesting meeting with one constituent from Chippenham who lost an arm in the Bali bomb outrage, and who has some very constructive criticisms of the way in which he was handled by the British Embassy after it; and another from Stanton St Quintin, whose brother was recently tragically murdered in Thailand, and who again was deeply unhappy about the way in which Consular officials handled the whole matter. We have resolved to plan a campaign to highlight deficiencies in Consular handling of such matters – 9/11, the Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, terrorist outrages, all spring to mind. Something of a campaign follows. In other words, intensely local and personalised concerns can sometimes read directly across into much wider Parliamentary activity. And so it should be.

The very nature of our British Parliamentary democracy depends on it – a constituency MP raising local matters but thereby seeking to make the nation a better place overall. What a fascinating world it all is.

 

Permalink

Wednesday, 21 February, 2007
James Gray: Guns and Swimming

Was it really only last week that we were celebrating the reprieve for the Lime Kiln Leisure Centre in Wootton Bassett? How hollow that sounded over the weekend with the shock announcement that North Wilts Leisure Ltd are to go into receivership, and that as a  result all six leisure centres- Corsham, Chippenham and Malmesbury as well as Wootton Bassett, Calne and Cricklade  would probably close. By Tuesday it appeared that the District Council had struck an eleventh hour deal to pay the wages of those employed at the centres for six weeks, thereby avoiding their closure. All well and good. But what a shambolic way to get there. Quite leaving aside the substantive point: that in this era of child obesity, unfitness and the build up to the 2012 Olympics we have a right to our gymns and  swimming pools, and our councils have a duty to provide them; quite leaving that aside, is the sheer incompetence of those responsible for the shambles not simply astonishing?

 

The finer detail of the relations between North Wilts District Council, North Wilts Leisure and the various consultants and others they have spent a fortune employing are too complex for as brief article like this. But what is for sure is that it is the District Council who have to take the rap for this disgraceful muddle. How can Liberal Democrat leader, Carol O’Gorman, who is said to have chaired an “emotional” meeting only a week ago after which the reprieve for Lime Kiln was announced have failed to know, or failed to foresee the insolvency of North Wilts leisure? A bit less “emotion,” fewer waving of the arms around and rolling of the eyes as it was described to me, and a more hard-headed approach to what is needed to keep the centres open may have something to recommend it, Carol.

 

Government – including local government – should not be about emotion, about spinning, about confusion. It should be about competent delivery; about business-like management of our lives. And that is something which the Liberal Democrats in North Wilts and the Labour Party in Westminster are demonstrably short of. There was something deeply irritating about the Prime Minister’s reaction to the tragic teenage shootings in South London during the week. “We must have more legislation” was his first reaction – despite the 38 Criminal Justice Acts in recent years. I was in Dunblane for a couple of days to visit my Mother, where hearts are still very sore over the awful shootings there more than ten years ago now. Handguns were banned then, resulting in our Olympic teams having to practice in France. But one thing is for sure – that ban, against which I spoke in my Maiden Speech despite my Dunblane background – has made not a blind bit of difference in South London today. We need a much more fundamental and hard-headed review of why society has broken down in the way it has; why it is that teenagers are taking part in drug gang warfare, and what the churches, families as well as government can do about it. The kneejerk reaction – “we must do something about this tragedy, so lets change the law”, not only produces bad law, but also misleads the body politic into the false presumption that “something has been done about it”, and so to relax their outrage.

 

Carol O’Gorman sought to curry votes by saving Wootton Bassett Leisure Centre, ignoring the appalling financial plight which she either knew all about or was culpably ignorant in not knowing about; Tony Blair seeks to assuage voters concerns by announcing new laws in reaction to every event. Both are guilty of gesture politics, and of a head-in-the-sand refusal to face up to the realities of their own failure in government. Both will ultimately pay the price at the ballot box.

 

Permalink

Thursday, 15 February, 2007
James Gray: Local Democracy

Britain is the most centralised country in the Western world. Of the money spent by our local councils, 75% comes from the Treasury and of all the countries in Europe, only Ireland gives less financial autonomy to its local authorities. But the power of local democracy, as we in North Wiltshire have witnessed this week, is right up there, kicking Mikhail Gorbachov’s contention that democracy is just a slogan firmly in the teeth.

 

Securing a future for local leisure facilities has been in the limelight since November when the District Council dropped its bombshell that definitely three and potentially all six leisure centres in North Wiltshire would close. This last week, we’ve seen a total triumph for people power and campaigning with the announcement on Monday that the Lime Kiln centre in Wootton Bassett would remain open for all to use and enjoy, aided by the private sector provider DC Leisure. 

 

The Save Our Sports campaign has been dynamic - rarely have I seen my constituents galvanized so resolutely into action by an issue of concern to them. And I am pleased and proud, both as the Chairman of the Save Our Sports Group and as their representative in Parliament, that their efforts have won the day. Of course, I remain extremely concerned about the future of leisure provision in Cricklade and Calne which, electorate-willing, will come into my constituency at the next General Election and I pledge to do all I can to help the continuing campaign to secure the centres there. I know that I and many across Wiltshire have been much buoyed by the Council’s decision to think again about closing Lime Kiln in response to the sheer force of public antipathy (and perhaps also to their disquiet at the thought of reprisals at the ballot box in May) but it doesn’t alter the fact that our local institutions and services will only continue to be available if we are prepared to fight for them.

 

As we have seen with the closure of our hospitals in Wiltshire, local needs often get short shrift to political tactics and financial expediency. We have also seen this with the closure of registrars’ offices in Corsham, Malmesbury, and Wootton Bassett -staggeringly illogical given the moves afoot in central Government to make the Civil Registration Service more flexible, especially in rural communities like ours - and with the planned closure of all but three of the Police enquiry offices in Wiltshire. I am much encouraged by the readiness of people in Wiltshire to stand up for the issues that matter to them, not least because although I am their elected representative to speak up for issues in Parliament, a lone voice locally would not be enough to contend the bureaucrats who are attempting to dismantle the fabric of our local community.

 

The House being in Recess for half term this week, I was glad to see the reverse of local cuts and closures when Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cornwall opened the new Hathaway Medical Centre in Chippenham. It’s a magnificent new facility for the people of the town and, I hope, some of the surrounding areas.

 

Permalink

Thursday, 08 February, 2007
James Gray: Blair's Decapitation

I hope that I will not offend too many of my readers if I say that I have currently got a sneaking sympathy for the embattled Mr Blair. Frankly, I have no idea whether or not he took bribes in return for  peerages. My guess is that he did not, or at least that perhaps he did not know that that was what was happening. Should it be he who takes the rap? Or the Labour Party more widely? Of course I dislike what he did in Iraq, and opposed it at the time. But I do rather accept his argument that right or wrong he believed he was doing what was best for the peace of the world, even if that turned out not to be the case! Does chopping Mr Blair’s head off assuage Labour’s guilt? I think not. And there is so much else that I dislike about what he and his Government have done. They should pay the price for all of that collectively, not as individuals.

 

So, having gone through a somewhat similar trial by tabloid myself recently, I do harbour a sneaking sympathy for Mr Blair personally. He seems to be the victim of something of a personal witch –hunt. His Party colleagues are closing in on him like circling vultures; and even the very many good things which he and his Government have done over ten years are becoming enmired in the personal opprobrium which is now landing on his head. The same thing of course happened to John Major, to Margaret Thatcher, to Harold Wilson and Ted Heath, and I suppose may be an inevitable consequence of the increasingly “Presidential” aspect of our formerly Parliamentary and Cabinet style of government. As the party in power loses its popularity, colleagues seeking who to blame turn on the leader, since not to do so might well result in blame being quite fairly apportioned amongst them.

 

Now the problem with all of this is that if his Labour colleagues succeed in hounding him out of office on personal grounds, and if they arrange a suitable coronation for Mr Brown, perhaps after some kind of token leadership election battle; if they do that, they hope that the electorate will breathe a sigh of relief as if they had removed the rotten apple, thereby allowing the new Labour bandwagon to roll on, perhaps even enjoying something of a “honeymoon period” and a bounce in the polls. That may be especially true if they cynically keep Mr Blair on until after an electoral meltdown in the local government elections in May. They can then slit his throat, blame him for all their troubles, thereby hoping to secure a victory in the general election two or three years later.

 

That all seems to me to be quite wrong from a democratic perspective. If indeed there are very many things fundamentally wrong with the way in which this country is being run; if we disapprove of one or more parts of their Foreign Policy; if in general terms we are tired of them , or dislike them; then our disaffection should not just be assuaged by the removal of a leader; we should have the opportunity of a General Election in which to give our judgement of them in the ballot box.

 

That is one reason why I am so glad to have been re-adopted as the Conservative candidate for North Wiltshire at the next election, despite the malign hounding at the hands of some parts of the press which I received over the last few months. I will be very happy to submit myself as a local MP to the judgement of the electorate at the next General Election, but more importantly to invite them to vote for me as a means of achieving a Conservative Government. Lets try and get the personalities out of politics, and focus a bit more on the policies. So I wholly agree with David Cameron’s call for Mr Blair to go. “Go, go, for pity’s sake go.” But when you do, go to the country. Submit yourself and your party to the judgement of the people.

 

Permalink

Thursday, 01 February, 2007
James Gray: Reselection

I cannot tell you how grateful I am to the members of the North Wiltshire Conservative Association, nor how personally happy I am that I was reselected as the candidate for the new North Wiltshire Constituency in the secret ballot which was concluded on Tuesday. (My one regret is that the people of Chippenham, Corsham and the surrounding villages, who, of course will have their own new Constituency, were not able to play a part in the ballot. They need have no fear. I will be their unstinting MP until the day of the Election, and they will always share a place in my heart with all the people of North Wiltshire.)

I have very much enjoyed - and am acutely aware of the honour and privilege inherent in - being your MP for ten years now, and am just so glad that this vote will mean that I can continue as it. I love both the constituency and Parliament and would have been devastated by the loss of either. And I so hope that I am right in thinking that the support of the voting members of the Conservative Party reasonably reflects the views of the wider electorate that despite the sad circumstances surrounding my divorce, you will want to support me by your vote in that General Election whenever it may be.

There can be no denying that recent weeks have been turbulent, and I am of course very sorry that there are a group of people ( I think a fairly small group) who were not able to support me in that ballot. I think that they may come to regret some of the language and tactics which they have used in what has become rather a bitter campaign. But I want to make it plain to them and to all that I hold no grudges, and will want to work with all good men (and women) and true who espouse the Conservative cause, and who are ready to work for Conservative victories in Town, District, County, European and General Elections alike. I look forward to a Cameron-led Conservative Government in two or three years time; I believe that all members of the Association do as well, and I pledge to work with all of them towards that great goal.

We must be proud of our democracy, tough as it can be at times. The members of the North Wiltshire Conservative Association used their democratic right to offer me their selection as Conservative candidate. In accepting that offer, I throw myself at the mercy of all of the voters of North Wilts, and will leave no stone unturned in the two or three years before the likely date of the election to demonstrate to them that I remain as committed and hardworking a local MP as I have always been.

I am so grateful to you all for your help and support in this as in so many ways, and solemnly pledge to continue to do all I can for all of you in Westminster, in Whitehall and here in Wiltshire.

 

Permalink

Next Page

Promoted by David Longridge on behalf of North Wiltshire Conservatives both at Unit 4 Forest Gate Pewsham Chippenham SN15 3RS